Government and the macroeconomy: past paper questions
Real questions on government and the macroeconomy
The newest 20 of 74 written questions, plus 121 multiple-choice. Open one to see it on the real paper.
- 0987/22 · October/November 2025 · Q3d[8]
Discuss whether or not perfume should be taxed at a higher rate than food.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2025 · Q4a[2]
Identify two policy measures a central bank could use to maintain price stability.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2025 · Q4b[4]
Explain two benefits to an economy of full employment.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2025 · Q4c[6]
Analyse how an increase in government spending on building houses could reduce unemployment.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2025 · Q5b[4]
Explain two differences between monetary policy and supply-side policy.
See it on the paper → - 0987/21 · May/June 2025 · Q1a[1]
Calculate the value of Gabon’s oil production as a percentage of Gabon’s GDP.
See it on the paper → - 0987/21 · May/June 2025 · Q1g[6]
Discuss whether or not a government should pay private sector firms to give work experience to unemployed young people.
See it on the paper → - 0987/21 · May/June 2025 · Q4a[2]
Identify two macroeconomic aims of government that may conflict.
See it on the paper → - 0987/21 · May/June 2025 · Q4c[6]
Analyse how a cut in the corporation (corporate income) tax rate can increase economic growth.
See it on the paper → - 0987/21 · May/June 2025 · Q4d[8]
Discuss whether or not a decrease in government spending will reduce inflation.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2024 · Q1a[1]
Calculate the percentage of the Jordanian labour force employed in the secondary sector.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · May/June 2024 · Q1b[2]
Identify two qualities of a good tax that the Tunisian government aimed to achieve.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · May/June 2024 · Q1d[4]
Explain two ways the Tunisian government tried to reduce frictional unemployment.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · May/June 2024 · Q1e[4]
Analyse the relationship between the change in Tunisia’s average wage and inflation rate.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · May/June 2024 · Q3d[8]
Discuss whether or not an economy with a high inflation rate will have a low economic growth rate.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · May/June 2024 · Q4a[2]
Identify two reasons why tax revenue is likely to fall during a recession.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · May/June 2024 · Q5d[8]
Discuss whether or not an increase in government spending on housing would benefit an economy.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2023 · Q2b[4]
Explain two reasons why a low inflation rate may increase a country’s economic growth rate.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2023 · Q3b[4]
Explain two types of unemployment.
See it on the paper → - 0987/22 · October/November 2023 · Q3c[6]
Analyse how supply-side policy measures could reduce unemployment.
See it on the paper →
What examiners said
As in some previous sessions, several candidates showed a confusion between a low inflation rate and a fall in prices. These candidates tended to run into difficulties. There were, however, some strong answers which examined, most commonly, the possible effects on international competitiveness and the willingness to invest.
— Examiner report, October/November 2023, 0987/22 Q2(b) (Cambridge)
This was extremely well answered. Most candidates showed a strong awareness of different types of unemployment. There were only a small proportion who either confused the different types or who seemed to be unaware of the different types. The most common confusion shown was that cyclical unemployment is caused by a fall in demand for one product rather than a fall in total demand.
— Examiner report, October/November 2023, 0987/22 Q3(b) (Cambridge)
A few candidates showed confusion over the meaning of supply-side policy measures. However, most candidates did analyse some relevant policy measures. These candidates tended to be strongest on education, training, lower personal income tax and subsidies where some good analytical links were provided.
— Examiner report, October/November 2023, 0987/22 Q3(c) (Cambridge)
Past papers, syllabus and examiner reports © UCLES (Cambridge University Press & Assessment). Questions are matched to topics from the official syllabus. AssessPro is independent and not endorsed by Cambridge.