0470.3.2.09 — Garibaldi and the invasion of Sicily and Naples.: past paper questions
Real questions on 0470.3.2.09 — garibaldi and the invasion of sicily and naples.
The newest 9 of 9 written questions. Open one to see it on the real paper.
- 0470/12 · May/June 2025 · Q2b[6]
Why did Garibaldi go to Sicily in 1860?
See it on the paper → - 0470/12 · February/March 2025 · Q2b[6]
Why was Garibaldi important to Italian unification?
See it on the paper → - 0470/13 · May/June 2024 · Q1c[10]
‘The defeat of the Kingdom of Naples in 1860 was the most important step towards Italian unification.’ How far do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
See it on the paper → - 0470/12 · February/March 2024 · Q10a[4]
What happened in the Kiel Mutiny?
See it on the paper → - 0470/12 · February/March 2024 · Q11b[6]
Why was the occupation of the Ruhr by French and Belgian troops important for Germany?
See it on the paper → - 0470/12 · February/March 2024 · Q13a[4]
Describe the rule of the Provisional Government in 1917.
See it on the paper → - 0470/12 · February/March 2024 · Q13b[6]
Why did Lenin introduce War Communism?
See it on the paper → - 0470/11 · May/June 2020 · Q1a[4]
Describe what Garibaldi did in 1860 to help Italian unification.
See it on the paper → - 0470/23 · October/November 2019 · Q5[8]
Study Source H. Why did Garibaldi make this speech in April 1861? Explain your answer using details of the source and your knowledge.
See it on the paper →
What examiners said
Most candidates were familiar with the occupation of the Ruhr by French and Belgian troops in 1923. However, weaker responses included details of the reasons for the occupation and the events, without making any explicit link to the question. It is important to read the question carefully in order to establish its focus. The emphasis of this question was on the importance for Germany of the French...
— Examiner report, February/March 2024, 0470/12 Q11(b) (Cambridge)
This question asked whether or not Source G is surprising. The crucial thing in a question of this nature is for candidates to make it clear whether or not they are surprised, and by what – only then can their explanations have a proper focus. Another thing for candidates to remember is that explanations should be consistent with the stance taken on surprise. Some candidates lost sight of this as...
— Examiner report, October/November 2019, 0470/23 Q5 (Cambridge)
Past papers, syllabus and examiner reports © UCLES (Cambridge University Press & Assessment). Questions are matched to topics from the official syllabus. AssessPro is independent and not endorsed by Cambridge.