The newest 7 of 7 written questions. Open one to see it on the real paper.
The local government of the Baja California peninsula have introduced water rationing to conserve water. Water rationing is where the water supply to homes and industry is turned off for a few hours each day. Suggest two effects of water rationing on the people of the Baja California peninsula.
See it on the paper →State two other strategies for improving water quality.
See it on the paper →A scientist is concerned about the number of deaths that occur each year due to people drinking water from unclean water sources. The scientist says: More lives can be saved if the money spent on treating water-related diseases is spent on providing potable water instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement...
See it on the paper →the impacts of an oil spill on a marine ecosystem.
See it on the paper →Suggest strategies for improving access to safe drinking water in the area shown in the photograph. Section B
See it on the paper →Describe government strategies that can help people in rural areas have access to safe drinking water.
See it on the paper →Give two strategies for improving water quality in the Odaw river and Korle lagoon.
See it on the paper →Many answers to this question were too vague, often focused on perceived longer-term effects such as there being more water available in the future, rather than on the effects on the people experiencing the water rationing.
— Examiner report, February/March 2025, 0680/22 Q2(d) (Cambridge)
The six-mark, level of response question allows the candidate to write more extensively about a topic and is designed so that the answer may bring in ideas and concepts from across the syllabus. It is often the case with this style of question that the candidate needs to decide whether they agree or disagree with the statement provided. They are credited according to the quality of their response,...
— Examiner report, October/November 2022, 0680/13 Q8(b) (Cambridge)
This question was generally well answered although some responses were too general and required more specific statements. Responses such as ‘kills fish’, ‘pollutes’ and ‘contaminates’ were insufficient since the question asked candidates to describe the impacts.
— Examiner report, May/June 2021, 0680/12 Q7(b) (Cambridge)
Past papers, syllabus and examiner reports © UCLES (Cambridge University Press & Assessment). Questions are matched to topics from the official syllabus. AssessPro is independent and not endorsed by Cambridge.